Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Ahava North America/Time To Smooth Age Control Eye Cream
Time To Smooth Age Control Eye Cream
Ahava North America

Time To Smooth Age Control Eye Cream

Anti-Aging

Ahava North America

Time To Smooth Age Control Eye Cream

Anti-Aging

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

96OUT OF 100Excellent

Ingredient safety only

range 82–100

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

lenses agree

100

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

89 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Cleaner options

See 89 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·19 of 23 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 19 of 23 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (1)

    • Aloe Vera Leaf Juice4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (18)

    • Aqua
    • Isostearyl Isostearate
    • Glycerin
    • Propylene Carbonate
    • Quaternium 18 Hectorite
    • Butylene Glycol
    • Propylene Glycol
    • Sodium Hyaluronate
    • Maris Sal
    • Cetyl/PEG/PPG 10/1 Dimethicone
    • Saccharide Isomerate
    • Panthenol
    • Allantoin
    • Bisabolol
    • Ceratonia Siliqua Gum
    • Dunaliella Salina Extract
    • Phoenix Dactylifera Fruit Extract
    • Polyglyceryl 4 Isostearate

    No data in our sources (4)

    • Cyclopentasiloxane & Peg/PPG 18/18 Dimethicone
    • Cyclomethicone & Dimethicone Crosspolymer
    • Ruscus Aculeatus Extract
    • Phenoxyethanol & Ethylhexlglycerin

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.