hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 90-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Cleaner options
See 501 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Good12 of 15 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 12 of 15 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (6)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (6)
No data in our sources (3)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.