Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/JD Glow Cosmetics/Liquid Lipstick, Crazen (2020 formulation)
Liquid Lipstick, Crazen (2020 formulation)
JD Glow Cosmetics

Liquid Lipstick, Crazen (2020 formulation)

uncategorized

JD Glow Cosmetics

Liquid Lipstick, Crazen (2020 formulation)

uncategorized

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

76OUT OF 100Good

Ingredient safety only

range 65–82

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    3 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Fair·12 of 20 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 12 of 20 listed ingredients; 8 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Flavor6/10flavouring agent · fragrance ingredientraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (9)

    • Isododecane
    • Trimethylsiloxysilicate
    • Dimethicone
    • Synthetic Beeswax
    • Kaolin Clay
    • Tin Oxide
    • Manganese Violet
    • Zinc
    • Mica

    No data in our sources (8)

    • Silica Dimethyl Silicate
    • Tocopheral Acetate
    • May Also Contain: Iron oxides
    • Red Lakes
    • Blue Lakes
    • Yellow Lakes
    • Orange Lakes
    • Copper

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.