Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Hard Candy/All Matte Up Nourishing Lip Crayon Coconut + Hemp Oil, Nude Pumps 2072 (2020 formulation)
HC
Hard Candy

All Matte Up Nourishing Lip Crayon Coconut + Hemp Oil, Nude Pumps 2072 (2020 formulation)

uncategorized

Your composite

43OUT OF 100Poor

range 38–56

42▲▼ split
Safety
56
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

36-point split

28

Scan

42

Precautionary

64

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No fair cohort on file, so no comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 54-point gap between the two loudest voices.

28Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

54 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Hard Candy as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·37 of 39 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 37 of 39 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (9)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • FLAVOR/AROMA6/10raters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • POLYETHYLENE4/10film forming · abrasive · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • MAY CONTAIN : YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 6 LAKE4/10colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 28 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (28)

  • DIMETHICONE
  • SYNTHETIC WAX
  • HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
  • DIETHYLHEXYL CARBONATE
  • ISOEICOSANE
  • POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE
  • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
  • DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
  • SILICA SILYLATE
  • MICA
  • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
  • SORBITAN ISOSTEARATE
  • PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
  • DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE
  • LECITHIN
  • POLYHYDROXYSTEARIC ACID
  • EUPHORBIA CERIFERA WAX
  • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATE
  • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
  • ISOSTEARIC ACID
  • POLYGLYCERYL-3 POLYRICINOLEATE
  • TIN OXIDE
  • DEHYDROACETIC ACID
  • DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
  • SODIUM SACCHARIN
  • CANNABIS SATIVA SEED OIL
  • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL
  • IRON OXIDES

No data in our sources (2)

  • ROSA CANNINA SEED EXTRACT
  • PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DH-T-BUTYL HYDROXYCINNAMATE

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.