Urban Decay
Eyeshadow, Half Baked (2019 formulation)
uncategorized
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 41-point gap between the two loudest voices.
47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientEvery rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
41 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good9 of 11 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 9 of 11 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 5 of 9 lists
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (5)
No data in our sources (2)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.