Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L.A. Colors/Dazzling Sparkle Drops Illuminating Skin Enhancer, Cid249 Starlight (2020 formulation)
Dazzling Sparkle Drops Illuminating Skin Enhancer, Cid249 Starlight (2020 formulation)
L.A. Colors

Dazzling Sparkle Drops Illuminating Skin Enhancer, Cid249 Starlight (2020 formulation)

Glitter
Pressed Glitter, Hungry Ghost

Cleaner pick · Safest glitter we have rated

Colourpop

Pressed Glitter, Hungry Ghost

+58 on ingredient safety

under $12

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 169 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

64OUT OF 100Fair

range 55–85

42▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

31-point split

58

Scan

51

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

169 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 57-point gap between the two loudest voices.

25ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 169 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

57 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates L.A. Colors as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·11 of 11 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 11 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (4)

    • MAY CONTAIN: TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • PROPYLPARABEN7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

    • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (7)

    • ISODODECANE
    • ISOHEXADECANE
    • MICA
    • HYDROGENATED STYRENE/ISOPRENE COPOLYMER
    • DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
    • SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
    • SILICA

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.