Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Tarte/Amazonian Clay 12-Hour Blush, Captivating (2018 formulation)
Amazonian Clay 12-Hour Blush, Captivating (2018 formulation)
Tarte

Amazonian Clay 12-Hour Blush, Captivating (2018 formulation)

Blushtypically $12–30
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+47 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 14534 cleaner options →6 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

66OUT OF 100Fair

range 59–84

53▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

50-point split

40

Scan

90

Precautionary

64

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

14534 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 50-point gap between the two loudest voices.

40Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
90Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 14534 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

50 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • At least one rating was auto-linked to this product on a low-confidence match, so it may describe a different size or variant.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·26 of 26 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 26 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (7)

  • titanium dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

    IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • polyethylene4/10film forming · abrasive · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Orange 4 Lake4/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • red 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • red 7 lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • red 28 lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (19)

  • mica
  • zinc stearate
  • tricaprylin
  • caprylic/capric triglyceride
  • cera alba/beeswax/cire abeille
  • ascorbyl palmitate
  • chlorphenesin
  • kaolin
  • lanolin
  • laureth-4
  • PEG-150 distearate
  • polysorbate 20
  • potassium sorbate
  • tetrasodium EDTA
  • tocopherol
  • ultramarines
  • bismuth oxychloride
  • iron oxides
  • manganese violet