Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/First Aid Beauty/Eye Duty Triple Remedy, Fair Medium (2018 formulation)
First Aid Beauty

Eye Duty Triple Remedy, Fair Medium (2018 formulation)

uncategorizedtypically $12–30
Peek Performance Overnight Repair Eye Cream

Cleaner pick · Safest eye care we have rated

bliss

Peek Performance Overnight Repair Eye Cream

+52 on ingredient safety

$26

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 695 cleaner options →3 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

67OUT OF 100Fair

range 55–89

48▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

63-point split

77

Scan

25

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

695 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.

25Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 695 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

65 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    11 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·40 of 41 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 40 of 41 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (6)

    • Retinyl Palmitate9/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Caffeine6/10perfuming · skin conditioningraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Benzyl Alcohol6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (34)

    • Water
    • Glycerin
    • Dimethicone
    • Pentylene Glycol
    • Isononyl Isononanoate
    • Polyglyceryl-3 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone
    • Hydroxyethyl Acrylate/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer
    • Corallina Officinalis Extract
    • Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
    • Chrysanthemum Parthenium Extract
    • Glycyrrhiza Glabra Root Extract
    • Aminobutyric Acid
    • Tocopherol
    • Hydrogenated Lecithin
    • Ethylhexyl Methoxycrylene
    • Isopropyl Myristate
    • Isohexadecane
    • Diethylhexyl Syringylidenemalonate
    • Hydrogenated Phosphatidylcholine
    • Sodium Polymethacrylate
    • Polysorbate 60
    • Isopropyl Titanium Triisostearate
    • Stearalkonium Hectorite
    • Polysilicone-11
    • Xanthan Gum
    • Sorbitan Isostearate
    • Aluminum Hydroxide
    • Stearic Acid
    • Polyester-8
    • Propylene Carbonate
    • Polyhydroxystearic Acid
    • Potassium Sorbate
    • Sodium Benzoate
    • CI 77491

    No data in our sources (1)

    • 77492

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.