Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L.A. Colors/Color Craze Nail Polish, Energy Source
Color Craze Nail Polish, Energy Source
L.A. Colors

Color Craze Nail Polish, Energy Source

Nail Polish
Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

Cleaner pick · Safest nails we have rated

Daylogic

Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

+67 on ingredient safety, gives up 56 on labor practices

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2107 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

60OUT OF 100Fair

range 45–94

33▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

95-point split

5

Scan

100

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2107 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 95-point gap between the two loudest voices.

5Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2107 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

95 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • At least one rating was auto-linked to this product on a low-confidence match, so it may describe a different size or variant.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·19 of 20 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 19 of 20 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (7)

    • Red 34 Lake8/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Acetyl Tributyl Citrate6/10perfuming · fragrance · plasticiserraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Yellow 5 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Blue 1 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Red 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Red 7 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (12)

    • Butyl Acetate
    • Ethyl Acetate
    • Nitrocellulose
    • Phthalic Anhydride/Trimellitic Anhydride/Glycols Copolymer
    • Isopropyl Alcohol
    • Stearalkonium Hectorite
    • Iron Oxides
    • Yellow 10 Lake
    • Ultramarines
    • Mica
    • Ferric Ammonium Ferrocyanide
    • Manganese Violet

    No data in our sources (1)

    • May Contain/Peut Contenir : Titanium Dioxide

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.