Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Giorgio Armani/EYE TINT LIQUID EYESHADOW, 39 Brown Volcano
EYE TINT LIQUID EYESHADOW, 39 Brown Volcano
Giorgio Armani

EYE TINT LIQUID EYESHADOW, 39 Brown Volcano

Eye Shadow

Giorgio Armani

EYE TINT LIQUID EYESHADOW, 39 Brown Volcano

Eye Shadow

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

30OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 5–88

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

83-point split

5

Scan

88

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

3275 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 83-point gap between the two loudest voices.

5Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
88Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 3275 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

83 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·44 of 52 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 44 of 52 listed ingredients; 8 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (6)

    • ISOBUTANE9/10propellantraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • MAY CONTAIN: CI 77891 / TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CI 42090 / BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 19140 / YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (38)

    • AQUA / WATER
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOL
    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • LAUROYL LYSINE
    • OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE
    • DIMETHICONE
    • BORON NITRIDE
    • CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE
    • ZEA MAYS STARCH / CORN STARCH
    • DIPENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAHYDROXYSTEARATE/TETRAISOSTEARATE
    • DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
    • SORBITAN ISOSTEARATE
    • ARGILLA / MAGNESIUM ALUMINUM SILICATE
    • MAGNESIUM SILICATE
    • SILICA
    • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
    • XANTHAN GUM
    • TIN OXIDE
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • ACRYLONITRILE/METHYL METHACRYLATE/VINYLIDENE CHLORIDECOPOLYMER
    • CETYL ALCOHOL
    • ALUMINA
    • GLYCERIN
    • GLYCERYL STEARATE
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499 / IRON OXIDES
    • CI 77120 / BARIUM SULFATE
    • CI 77007 / ULTRAMARINES
    • CI 77288 / CHROMIUM OXIDE GREENS
    • CI 77742 / MANGANESE VIOLET
    • CI 77510 / FERRIC FERROCYANIDE
    • CI 77400 / BRONZE POWDER
    • CI 77400 / COPPER POWDER
    • CI 75470 / CARMINE
    • CI 77163 / BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE
    • CI 77510 / FERRIC AMMONIUM FERROCYANIDE
    • MICA

    No data in our sources (8)

    • STEARETH
    • 20
    • PEG
    • 75 STEARATE
    • SILICA [NANO] / SILICA
    • ISOCETETH
    • 10
    • CETETH

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.