Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Profusion/Cosmetics Multi Dimensional Glitter Long Wearing Formula Glitter Eyeliner Mystic Topaz (2020 formulation)
Cosmetics Multi Dimensional Glitter Long Wearing Formula Glitter Eyeliner Mystic Topaz (2020 formulation)
Profusion

Cosmetics Multi Dimensional Glitter Long Wearing Formula Glitter Eyeliner Mystic Topaz (2020 formulation)

Eye Linertypically under $12
Liquid Mineral Eyeliner

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Mineral Fusion

Liquid Mineral Eyeliner

+27 on ingredient safety, gives up 7 on labor practices

0.1oz · $17.99 · $179.90/oz

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 5499 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

71OUT OF 100Good

range 68–79

73▲▼ split
Safety
54
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

4-point split

90

Scan

93

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

5499 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 30-point gap between the two loudest voices.

64IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 5499 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

30 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

raters agree
  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·12 of 17 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 12 of 17 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (6)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • ACRYLATES COPOLYMER4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CARBOMER4/10emulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • D&C BLACK NO.24/10raters disagree

    IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (6)

  • GLYCERIN
  • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
  • AMINOMETHYL PROPANOL
  • ACRYLATES/VINYL ISODECANOATE CROSSPOLYMER
  • TIN OXIDE
  • MAY CONTAIN: IRON OXIDE RED

No data in our sources (5)

  • GLITTER EYELINER INGREDIENTS: WATER
  • FLUORPHLOGOPITE
  • ALUMINUM
  • FD&C RED NO.40 AI LAKE
  • FD&C YELLOW NO.5 AI LAKE

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.