Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Revlon/ColorStay Gel Envy Longwear Nail Enamel 625 Get Lucky (2019 formulation)
ColorStay Gel Envy Longwear Nail Enamel 625 Get Lucky (2019 formulation)
Revlon

ColorStay Gel Envy Longwear Nail Enamel 625 Get Lucky (2019 formulation)

Nail Polishtypically $12–30
Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

Cleaner pick · Safest nails we have rated

Daylogic

Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

+81 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 3648 cleaner options →1 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

38OUT OF 100Horrible

range 31–63

19▲▼ split
Safety
64
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

95-point split

0

Scan

95

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

3648 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 95-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 3648 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

95 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Revlon as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·39 of 41 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 39 of 41 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (11)

  • BENZOPHENONE-18/10uv absorberraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • RED 30 LAKE8/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 34 LAKE8/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • ACETYL TRIBUTYL CITRATE6/10perfuming · fragrance · plasticiserraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • ACRYLATES COPOLYMER4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 6 LAKE4/10colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (28)

  • BUTYL ACETATE
  • ETHYL ACETATE
  • NITROCELLULOSE
  • ADIPIC ACID/NEOPENTYL GLYCOL/TRIMELLITIC ANHYDRIDE COPOLYMER
  • ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
  • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
  • STEARALKONIUM BENTONITE
  • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
  • POLYBUTYLENE TEREPHTHALATE
  • CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE
  • SILICA
  • POLYURETHANE-11
  • POLYURETHANE-33
  • TRIMETHYLPENTANEDIYL DIBENZOATE
  • ACRYLATES/DIMETHICONE COPOLYMER
  • ALUMINA
  • DIPENTAERYTHRITYL HEXAACRYLATE
  • POLYACRYLATE-35
  • MICA
  • IRON OXIDES
  • FERRIC AMMONIUM FERROCYANIDE
  • YELLOW 10 LAKE
  • MANGANESE VIOLET
  • ALUMINUM POWDER
  • FERRIC FERROCYANIDE
  • BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE
  • ULTRAMARINES
  • TIN OXIDE

No data in our sources (2)

  • BORNANEDIONE MAY CONTAIN
  • BLACK 2 [NANO

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.