Hawaiian Tropic
Moisturizer After Sun
After Sun
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.
0Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 244 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
85 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
16 ratings · 4 of 4 axes
- At least one rating was auto-linked to this product on a low-confidence match, so it may describe a different size or variant.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
What we know about the packaging
Partly identified1 of 2 identified
1 of 2 packaging components is a named material; Plastic (unspecified) is recorded only in general terms, so that part of the score is a stand-in.
- Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
How we know the packaging
Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.
A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust40 of 41 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 40 of 41 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (11)
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (29)
- WATER
- ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
- GLYCERIN
- PETROLATUM
- CETYL ALCOHOL
- CETEARYL ALCOHOL
- ISOPROPYL MYRISTATE
- GLYCERYL STEARATE
- CETETH-10 PHOSPHATE
- DICETYL PHOSPHATE
- ALLANTOIN
- BENZOPHENONE-4
- BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
- DIMETHICONE
- MANGIFERA INDICA SEED BUTTER
- PERSEA GRATISSIMA OIL
- THEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTER
- DISODIUM EDTA
- PEG-8 DIMETHICONE
- CARICA PAPAYA FRUIT EXTRACT
- COLOCASIA ANTIQUORUM ROOT EXTRACT
- MANGIFERA INDICA FRUIT EXTRACT
- PASSIFLORA INCARNATA FRUIT EXTRACT
- PLUMERIA ACUTIFOLIA FLOWER EXTRACT
- PSIDIUM GUAJAVA FRUIT EXTRACT
- OCTYLDODECANOL
- SILICA
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- YELLOW 10
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.