Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/hue noir/True Hues Flawless Matte Finish Foundation, Masala 031 (2018 formulation)
True Hues Flawless Matte Finish Foundation, Masala 031 (2018 formulation)
hue noir

True Hues Flawless Matte Finish Foundation, Masala 031 (2018 formulation)

uncategorized
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+81 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 18652 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

53OUT OF 100Poor

range 43–84

19▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

25-point split

15

Scan

0

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

18652 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 18652 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·28 of 29 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 28 of 29 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (6)

  • CYCLOMETHICONE10/10emollient · hair conditioning · solventraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • DIAZOLIDINYL UREA8/10preservativeraters disagree

    Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • PROPYLPARABEN7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

  • CYCLOPENTASILOXANE4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • POLYURETHANE-354/10bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (22)

  • WATER
  • ISODODECANE
  • GLYCERYL STEARATE
  • PEG-100 STEARATE
  • GLYCERIN
  • DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
  • SILICA
  • STEARIC ACID
  • SORBITAN LAURATE
  • POLYGLYCERYL-4 LAURATE
  • DILAURYL CITRATE
  • DIMETHICONE
  • PROPYLENE GLYCOL
  • ACRYLATES OCTYLACRYLAMIDE COPOLYMER
  • XANTHAN GUM
  • TOCOPHEROL
  • CI 77489
  • CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI77499
  • CI 77007
  • CI 77288

No data in our sources (1)

  • METHYLEPARABEN

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.