Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Wet n Wild/Wildshine Nail Color, 487 E Grape Minds Think Alike
Wildshine Nail Color, 487 E Grape Minds Think Alike
Wet n Wild

Wildshine Nail Color, 487 E Grape Minds Think Alike

Nail Polish
Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

Cleaner pick · Safest nails we have rated

Daylogic

Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

+39 on ingredient safety, gives up 56 on labor practices

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 962 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

74OUT OF 100Good

range 65–92

61▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

25-point split

70

Scan

95

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

962 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 50-point gap between the two loudest voices.

45ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 962 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

50 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Wet n Wild as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·20 of 24 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 20 of 24 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (5)

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE/CI 778918/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • ACETYL TRIBUTYL CITRATE6/10perfuming · fragrance · plasticiserraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • BLUE 1 LAKE/CI 420904/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeing · colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • YELLOW 5 LAKE/CI 19140)4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (15)

    • BUTYL ACETATE
    • ETHYL ACETATE
    • NITROCELLULOSE
    • ADIPIC ACID/NEOPENTYL GLYCOL/TRIMELLITIC ANHYDRIDE COPOLYMER
    • ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
    • ADIPIC ACID/FUMARIC ACID/TRICYCLODECANE DIMETHANOL COPOLYMER
    • STEARALKONIUM HECTORITE
    • SUCROSE ACETATE ISOBUTYRATE
    • TRIMETHYL PENTANYL DIISOBUTYRATE
    • STEARALKONIUM BENTONITE
    • DIACETONE ALCOHOL
    • IRON OXIDES/CI 77491
    • CI 77499
    • MICA
    • FERRIC AMMONIUM FERROCYANIDE/CI 77510

    No data in our sources (4)

    • BLACK 2/CI 77266
    • RED 6 LAKE/CI 15850
    • RED 7 LAKE/CI 15850
    • RED 34 LAKE/CI 15880

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.