Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Tarte/Go with the Faux Freckle Stamp, Rich
Go with the Faux Freckle Stamp, Rich
Tarte

Go with the Faux Freckle Stamp, Rich

Bronzer Highlighter$26 MSRP
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+23 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2266 cleaner options →6 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

75OUT OF 100Good

range 71–85

77▲▼ split
Safety
72
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

28-point split

70

Scan

98

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2266 found

See better →

Flagged

6 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 28-point gap between the two loudest voices.

70Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2266 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

28 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · IARC Monographs

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 67% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·18 of 18 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 18 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (6)

  • acrylates copolymer4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • styrene/acrylates copolymer4/10film forming · opacifyingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Red 334/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • yellow 54/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • blue 14/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (12)

  • Water/Aqua/Eau
  • butylene glycol
  • propylene glycolcommon irritant
  • glycerinhumectant
  • PEG-11 methyl ether dimethicone
  • kaolin
  • PPG-26-buteth-26
  • PEG-40 hydrogenated castor oil
  • caprylyl glycol
  • PPG-2 methyl etherfragrance material
  • simethicone
  • cellulose gum
What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • common irritantpropylene glycol

    • propylene glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
  • humectantglycerin

    • glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".