Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 33-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65California Proposition 65Government
vs98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientEvery rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
33 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Garnier as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust22 of 23 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 22 of 23 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (2)
Prop 65-listedflagged by 4 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (20)
- GLYCERIN
- BUTYLENE GLYCOL
- NIACINAMIDE
- ISONONYL ISONONANOATE
- ALUMINUM STARCH OCTENYLSUCCINATE
- CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
- GLYCINE SOJA OIL/SOYBEAN OIL
- DIMETHICONE
- EUTERPE OLERACEA FRUIT EXTRACT
- SODIUM POLYACRYLATE
- SCHISANDRA CHINENSIS FRUIT EXTRACT
- SODIUM HYALURONATE
- CHLORPHENESIN
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- TRISODIUM ETHYLENEDIAMINE DISUCCINATE
- PANTHENOL
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
- MALTODEXTRIN
- POLYGLYCERYL-3 METHYLGLUCOSE DISTEARATE
- ACRYLATES/BEHENETH-25 METHACRYLATE COPOLYMER
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.