Revlon
Super Lustrous The Luscious Mattes, Black Cherry
Lipsticktypically $12–30
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+59 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 54-point gap between the two loudest voices.
28Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 9562 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
54 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Revlon as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust29 of 30 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 29 of 30 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (10)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (19)
- Diisopropyl Dimer Dilinoleate
- Isononyl Isononanoate
- Ozokerite
- Aluminum Starch Octenylsuccinate
- Mica
- Octyldodecyl Neopentanoate
- Silica
- Kaolin
- Cera Carnauba/Copernicia Cerifera Wax/Cire De Carnauba
- Synthetic Wax
- Cera Microcristallina/Microcrystalline Wax/Cire Microcristalline
- Barium Sulfate
- Moringa Oleifera Seed Oil
- Theobroma Grandiflorum Seed Butter
- Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
- Agave Rigida Extract
- Hydrogenated Polyisobutene
- Anemarrhena Asphodeloides Root Extract
- Ethylene/Propylene Copolymer
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.