Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Jones Road/The Best Blush, Berry
The Best Blush, Berry
Jones Road

The Best Blush, Berry

Blush

Jones Road

The Best Blush, Berry

Blush

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

79OUT OF 100Good

range 77–80

—
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

90

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

179 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Cleaner options

See 179 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · IARC Monographs · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

5 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·15 of 17 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 15 of 17 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (3)

  • Nylon-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Polymethyl Methacrylate4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CI 15850/Red 64/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (12)

  • Mica
  • Synthetic Fluorphlogopite
  • Magnesium Myristate
  • Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate
  • HDI/Trimethylol Hexyllactone Crosspolymer
  • Squalane
  • Stearoyl Glutamic Acid
  • Hydrogenated Polycyclopentadiene
  • Silica
  • Caprylyl Glycol
  • 1,2-Hexanediol
  • CI 77742/Manganese Violet

No data in our sources (2)

  • May Contain +/-: CI 77491/CI 77492/ CI 77499/Iron Oxides
  • CI 15850/Red 7 Lake

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.