Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L'Oréal/Havana Camila Cabello Sun Lit Bronzer, Light/medium (2018 formulation)
Havana Camila Cabello Sun Lit Bronzer, Light/medium (2018 formulation)
L'Oréal

Havana Camila Cabello Sun Lit Bronzer, Light/medium (2018 formulation)

Bronzer Highlighter
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+40 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 11567 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

45OUT OF 100Poor

range 38–59

60▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

20-point split

80

Scan

68

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

11567 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 43-point gap between the two loudest voices.

45ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 11567 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

43 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates L'Oréal as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·27 of 29 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 27 of 29 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (6)

    • CI 77891/TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • ALCOHOL DENAT6/10fragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CYCLOHEXASILOXANE4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • POLYACRYLAMIDE4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (21)

    • GLYCERIN
    • MICA
    • BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER/SHEA BUTTER
    • DIMETHICONE
    • AMMONIUM POLYACRYLOYLDIMETHYL TAURATE
    • POLYGLYCERYL-6 DISTEARATE
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77499/IRON OXIDES
    • POLYSILICONE-1
    • PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAETHYLHEXANOATE
    • JOJOBA ESTERS
    • CAPRYLOYL SALICYLIC ACID
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • SODIUM CITRATE
    • BORON NITRIDE
    • POLYGLYCERYL-3 BEESWAX
    • CETYL ALCOHOL
    • C13-14 ISOPARAFFIN
    • ADENOSINE
    • DISODIUM EDTA
    • CI 77163/BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE

    No data in our sources (2)

    • 917123: WATER
    • LAURETH-7 F.I.L. #D223290/1

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.