Wet n Wild
Megaslicks Lip Gloss, 557 B Cherish
Lip Gloss
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+45 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.
42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 4929 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
40 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Wet n Wild as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- At least one rating was auto-linked to this product on a low-confidence match, so it may describe a different size or variant.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust27 of 30 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 27 of 30 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (5)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (22)
- POLYBUTENE
- OCTYLDODECANOL
- HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
- SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
- ETHYLENE/PROPYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
- DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
- CERESIN
- OLEIC/LINOLEIC/LINOLENIC POLYGLYCERIDES
- TRIHYDROXYSTEARIN
- VITIS VINIFERA SEED OIL
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- BUTYLENE/ETHYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
- SORBIC ACID
- TOCOPHEROL
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
- GLYCINE SOJA OIL
- TIN OXIDE
- IRON OXIDES/CI 77491
- CI 77492
- CI 77499
- MICA
No data in our sources (3)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.