Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Benefit/Boi-ing Industrial Strength Concealer, 05 Tan Neutral
Boi-ing Industrial Strength Concealer, 05 Tan Neutral
Benefit

Boi-ing Industrial Strength Concealer, 05 Tan Neutral

Concealer
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+46 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 14248 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

54OUT OF 100Poor

range 51–66

54▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

31-point split

45

Scan

55

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

14248 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 45-point gap between the two loudest voices.

45ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 14248 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

45 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 50% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Benefit as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·24 of 24 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 24 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (8)

  • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

    IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • BENZYL ALCOHOL6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • NYLON-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (16)

  • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
  • PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
  • ISOPROPYL PALMITATE
  • EUPHORBIA CERIFERA WAX
  • PARAFFINUM LIQUIDUM
  • SILICA
  • KAOLIN
  • CERA MICROCRISTALLINA
  • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
  • LECITHIN
  • TOCOPHEROL
  • CI 77007
  • CI 77163
  • CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77499

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from ethicalelephant.com ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.