Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L'Oréal/L'or al Paris Deep Warm W9.5 Super Blendable Foundation
L'or al Paris Deep Warm W9.5 Super Blendable Foundation
L'Oréal

L'or al Paris Deep Warm W9.5 Super Blendable Foundation

Foundation

L'Oréal

L'or al Paris Deep Warm W9.5 Super Blendable Foundation

Foundation

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

62OUT OF 100Fair

range 59–69

—
Pkg

Why this score

32-point split

100

Scan

68

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

483 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 32-point gap between the two loudest voices.

68Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 483 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

32 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

6 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·10 of 11 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 10 of 11 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (2)

  • CYCLOHEXASILOXANE4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • METHYL METHACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (8)

  • AQUA/WATER
  • DIMETHICONE
  • ISODODECANE
  • GLYCERIN
  • PEG-10 DIMETHICONE
  • BUTYLENE GLYCOL
  • PENTYLENE GLYCOL
  • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE

No data in our sources (1)

  • DISTEARDIMONIUM

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.