Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Alba Botanica/Therapy Hawaiian Marula Miracle Moisture Cleansing Conditioner
Therapy Hawaiian Marula Miracle Moisture Cleansing Conditioner
Alba Botanica

Therapy Hawaiian Marula Miracle Moisture Cleansing Conditioner

Conditioner

Alba Botanica

Therapy Hawaiian Marula Miracle Moisture Cleansing Conditioner

Conditioner

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

59OUT OF 100Fair

range 53–72

—
Eco
—
Labor

Why this score

27-point split

71

Scan

98

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

345 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 38-point gap between the two loudest voices.

60ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 345 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

38 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 60% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·39 of 40 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 39 of 40 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (9)

    • LIMONENE7/10perfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • ALCOHOL6/10fragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • ALOE BARBADENSIS LEAF JUICE4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA OIL4/10fragrance · tonicraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • BEHENTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE4/10preservative · antistatic · hair conditioningraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • SODIUM HYDROXIDE4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • VANILLIN4/10fragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (30)

    • WATER
    • CETEARYL ALCOHOL
    • GLYCERIN
    • CETYL ALCOHOL
    • GLYCERYL STEARATE SE
    • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL
    • CYAMOPSIS TETRAGONOLOBA GUM
    • BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
    • CITRUS AURANTIUM DULCIS PEEL OIL
    • MANGIFERA INDICA SEED BUTTER
    • MACADAMIA TERNIFOLIA SEED OIL
    • SCLEROCARYA BIRREA SEED OIL
    • CHENOPODIUM QUINOA SEED
    • COCOS NUCIFERA FRUIT JUICE
    • COCOS NUCIFERA WATER
    • GARDENIA TAHITENSIS FLOWER EXTRACT
    • ASCORBYL PALMITATE
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • COCO-GLUCOSIDE
    • DISODIUM COCOYL GLUTAMATE
    • GLYCERYL OLEATE
    • GUAR HYDROXYPROPYLTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE
    • HEPTYL GLUCOSIDE
    • ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
    • PANTHENOL
    • SODIUM CHLORIDE
    • TRIETHYL CITRATE
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • POTASSIUM SORBATE
    • SODIUM BENZOATE

    No data in our sources (1)

    • ALEURITES MOLUCCANA SEED OIL

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.