Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Sisley/Phyto-Teint Perfection, 3N Apricot
Phyto-Teint Perfection, 3N Apricot
Sisley

Phyto-Teint Perfection, 3N Apricot

uncategorized
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+43 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 12806 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

44OUT OF 100Poor

range 36–62

57▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12806 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 12806 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

52 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Sisley as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·39 of 41 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 39 of 41 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • PARFUM/FRAGRANCE6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (36)

    • AQUA/WATER/EAU
    • DIMETHICONE
    • ISODODECANE
    • ACRYLATES/ETHYLHEXYL ACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER
    • DIPHENYL DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIPHENYL DIMETHICONE/SILSESQUIOXANE CROSSPOLYMER
    • DICAPRYLYL CARBONATE
    • PENTYLENE GLYCOL
    • GLYCERIN
    • DIMETHICONE/PEG-10/15 CROSSPOLYMER
    • SODIUM CHLORIDE
    • CUCUMIS SATIVUS FRUIT EXTRACT
    • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
    • PRUNUS PERSICA FLOWER EXTRACT
    • BIOSACCHARIDE GUM-1
    • LENS ESCULENTA SEED EXTRACT
    • ARCTIUM MAJUS ROOT EXTRACT
    • PAEONIA OFFICINALIS FLOWER EXTRACT
    • POLYGONUM FAGOPYRUM SEED EXTRACT
    • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILYLCARBAMOYL PULLULAN
    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • PULLULAN
    • MALTODEXTRIN
    • GLYCERYL CAPRYLATE
    • BUTYLENE GLYCOL
    • DIMETHICONOL
    • TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
    • STEARALKONIUM HECTORITE
    • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
    • PROPYLENE CARBONATE
    • DIPROPYLENE GLYCOL
    • 1,2-HEXANEDIOL
    • SODIUM CITRATE
    • SODIUM BENZOATE
    • POTASSIUM SORBATE
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • IRON OXIDES

    No data in our sources (2)

    • LAURYL PEG-10 TRIS SILYLETHYL DIMETHICONE
    • MAY CONTAIN

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.