Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L'Oréal/Infallible Matte-Matic Mechanical Eyeliner, 514 Taupe Grey (2019 formulation)
Infallible Matte-Matic Mechanical Eyeliner, 514 Taupe Grey (2019 formulation)
L'Oréal

Infallible Matte-Matic Mechanical Eyeliner, 514 Taupe Grey (2019 formulation)

Eye Liner
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+40 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 9405 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

56OUT OF 100Fair

range 52–66

60▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

80

Scan

90

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

9405 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 43-point gap between the two loudest voices.

47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
90Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 9405 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

43 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates L'Oréal as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·27 of 28 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 27 of 28 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (4)

  • CI 77891 / TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10raters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

    IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • POLYETHYLENE4/10film forming · abrasive · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (23)

  • DIMETHICONErich occlusive
  • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
  • SYNTHETIC WAX
  • PHENYLPROPYLDIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
  • DISILOXANE
  • POLYHYDROXYSTEARIC ACID
  • CAPRYLYL TRIMETHICONE
  • DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
  • SILICA
  • PROPYLENE CARBONATE
  • LECITHIN
  • TIN OXIDE
  • TOCOPHEROL
  • ASCORBYL PALMITATE
  • MAY CONTAIN CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77499 / IRON OXIDES
  • MICA
  • CI 77000 / ALUMINUM POWDER
  • CI 77510 / FERRIC AMMONIUM FERROCYANIDE
  • CI 77007 / ULTRAMARINES
  • CL 75470 / CARMINE
  • CI 77510 / FERRIC FERROCYANIDE

No data in our sources (1)

  • CI 77266 / BLACK 2

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE

    • DIMETHICONE: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.