Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/TIRTIR/Waterism Glow Tint, 03 SAND MOND
Waterism Glow Tint, 03 SAND MOND
TIRTIR

Waterism Glow Tint, 03 SAND MOND

Lip Balmtypically $12–30
Grapefruit & Currant Thinkdaily Lip Balm

Cleaner pick · Safest lip care we have rated

Thinkbaby

Grapefruit & Currant Thinkdaily Lip Balm

+44 on ingredient safety

$3.49

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1593 cleaner options →6 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

56OUT OF 100Fair

Ingredient safety only

range 42–88

56▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1593 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 46-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1593 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

46 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·45 of 48 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 45 of 48 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (5)

    • ci 77891/titanium dioxide8/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • parfum/fragrance6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • lactic acid4/10exfoliating acidhumectant · buffering · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • ci 19140/yellow 54/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (40)

    • diisostearyl malate
    • aqua/water/eau
    • bis-diglyceryl polyacyladipate-2
    • diphenylsiloxy phenyl trimethicone
    • trimethyl pentaphenyl trisiloxane
    • hydrogenated polyisobutene
    • diglycerin
    • glycerinhumectant
    • pentylene glycol
    • cetyl peg/ppg-10/1 dimethicone
    • calcium titanium borosilicate
    • sorbitan isostearate
    • ceteareth-20
    • hydroxyethyl acrylate/sodium acryloyldimethyl taurate copolymer
    • squalane
    • chlorella vulgaris extract
    • glucose
    • butylene glycol
    • fructooligosaccharides
    • fructose
    • sodium dilauramidoglutamide lysine
    • ethylhexylglycerin
    • polysorbate 60
    • trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate
    • tin oxide
    • ammonium polyacrylate
    • 1,2-hexanediol
    • aluminum hydroxide
    • pentaerythrityl tetra-di-t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate
    • ethylhexyl palmitate
    • persea gratissima fruit extract
    • maltodextrin
    • tribehenin
    • sucrose palmitate
    • hydrogenated lecithin
    • macadamia integrifolia seed oil
    • simmondsia chinensis seed oil
    • vitis vinifera seed oil
    • olea europaea fruit oil
    • palmitoyl tripeptide-1

    No data in our sources (3)

    • ci 42090/blue 1
    • ci 17200/red 33
    • ci 15985/yellow 6

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (3)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • undeclared fragrance blendparfum/fragrance

      • parfum/fragrance: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
    • exfoliating acidlactic acid

      • lactic acid: An alpha hydroxy acid that loosens surface skin cells; it also makes skin more sun-sensitive while you use it. FDA, "Guidance for Industry: Labeling for Topically Applied Cosmetic Products Containing Alpha Hydroxy Acids as Ingredients" (announced at 70 FR 1721, 10 January 2005; FDA web pages title it "Labeling for Cosmetics Containing Alpha Hydroxy Acids"), which names this acid and recommends the statement "Sunburn Alert: This product contains an alpha hydroxy acid (AHA) that may increase your skin's sensitivity to the sun and particularly the possibility of sunburn."
    • humectantglycerin

      • glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".