Glo Skin Beauty
Lip gloss, Star Struck (2020 formulation)
Lip Glosstypically $70+
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+77 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.
0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 11044 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
85 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Glo Skin Beauty as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust30 of 31 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 30 of 31 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (11)
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
EU-prohibitedflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (19)
- Polybutene
- Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
- Octyldodecanol
- Candelilla Cera/Euphorbia Cerifera Wax/Cire de Candelilla
- Calcium Aluminum Borosilicate
- Cera Carnauba/Copernicia Cerifera Wax/Cire de Carnauba
- Ricinus Communis Seed Oil
- Trihydroxystearin
- Mica
- Silica
- Bumetrizole
- Carthamus Tinctorius Seed Oil
- Tocopherol
- Tocopheryl Acetate
- Camellia Oleifera Leaf Extract
- CI 77491
- CI 77492
- CI 77499
- CI 75470
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from gloskinbeauty.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.