Revlon
Super Lustrous Lipstick 762 Flushed (2020 formulation)
Lipsticktypically $12–30
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+37 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 27-point gap between the two loudest voices.
55Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 3348 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
27 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Revlon as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust28 of 30 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 28 of 30 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (6)
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (22)
- TRIOCTYLDODECYL CITRATE
- OZOKERITE
- POLYBUTENE
- ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
- OCTYLDODECYL NEOPENTANOATE
- MICA
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAISOSTEARATE
- BIS-DIGLYCERYL POLYACYLADIPATE-2
- C10-30 CHOLESTEROL/LANOSTEROL ESTERS
- CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
- CERA MICROCRISTALLINA/MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX/CIRE MICROCRISTALLINE
- PARAFFIN
- SILICA
- ASCORBYL PALMITATE
- BARIUM SULFATE
- ETHYLENE/PROPYLENE COPOLYMER
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAETHYLHEXANOATE
- SERICA POWDER/SILK POWDER
- SYNTHETIC WAX
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- BENZOIC ACID
- IRON OXIDES
No data in our sources (2)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.