Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L'Oréal/Paris Magic Skin Beautifier BB Cream - Anti-Redness
Paris Magic Skin Beautifier BB Cream - Anti-Redness
L'Oréal

Paris Magic Skin Beautifier BB Cream - Anti-Redness

BB Cream

L'Oréal

Paris Magic Skin Beautifier BB Cream - Anti-Redness

BB Cream

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

51OUT OF 100Poor

range 49–59

Why this score

33-point split

48

Scan

43

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

206 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 39-point gap between the two loudest voices.

43Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 206 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

39 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 4 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·33 of 34 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 33 of 34 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (9)

  • May contain: CI 77891/Titanium Dioxide8/10raters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Methylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • Cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Cyclohexasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Methyl Methacrylate Crosspolymer4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CI 45410/Red 28 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • CI 19140/Yellow 5 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • CI 42090/Blue 1 Lake)4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (24)

  • Aqua/Water
  • Isododecane
  • Glycerin
  • PEG-10 Dimethicone
  • Butylene Glycol
  • Dimethicone
  • Isoeicosane
  • Disteardimonium Hectorite
  • Boron Nitride
  • Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone
  • Sodium Chloride
  • Polyglyceryl-4 Isostearate
  • Hexyl Laurate
  • Acrylates/Ammonium Methacrylate Copolymer
  • Caprylyl Glycol
  • Triethyl Citrate
  • Aluminum Hydroxide
  • Tocopherol
  • Panthenol
  • Alumina
  • CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77499/Iron Oxides
  • CI 15985/Yellow 6 Lake

No data in our sources (1)

  • C9-15 Fluoroalcohol Phosphates/C9-15 Fluoroalcohol Phosphate

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.