Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Benefit/They're Real! Magnet Powerful Lifting & Lengthening Mascara, Supercharged Black
They're Real! Magnet Powerful Lifting & Lengthening Mascara, Supercharged Black
Benefit

They're Real! Magnet Powerful Lifting & Lengthening Mascara, Supercharged Black

uncategorized
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+28 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 6692 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

63OUT OF 100Fair

range 60–70

72▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

23-point split

70

Scan

93

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

6692 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 28-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 6692 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

28 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 61% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Benefit as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·34 of 36 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 34 of 36 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (5)

  • CI 77891 )8/10colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • ACRYLATES COPOLYMER4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (29)

  • CERA ALBA
  • PARAFFIN
  • POLYBUTENE
  • VP/EICOSENE COPOLYMER
  • GLYCERYL STEARATE
  • COPERNICIA CERIFERA WAX
  • STEARETH-21
  • PALMITIC ACID
  • PVP
  • STEARIC ACID
  • SILICA
  • PENTYLENE GLYCOL
  • STEARETH-2
  • AMINOMETHYL PROPANEDIOL
  • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
  • PANTHENOL
  • HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSE
  • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
  • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
  • DISODIUM PHOSPHATE
  • SODIUM PHOSPHATE
  • POLYSORBATE 60
  • CI 77007
  • CI 77163
  • CI 77288
  • CI 77289
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77510
  • CI 77742

No data in our sources (2)

  • C 77491
  • 0177499

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from ethicalelephant.com ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.