Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Rare Beauty/Kind Words Matte Lip Liner, Humble
Kind Words Matte Lip Liner, Humble
Rare Beauty

Kind Words Matte Lip Liner, Humble

Lip Linertypically $12–30

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+44 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 4614 cleaner options →9 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

73OUT OF 100Good

range 65–91

56▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
90
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

40-point split

55

Scan

42

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

4614 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 48-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 4614 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

48 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Rare Beauty as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·29 of 29 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 29 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (5)

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • Fragrance/Parfum6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Linalool6/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Blue 1 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Red 7 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (24)

    • Trimethylsiloxysilicate
    • Isohexadecane
    • Synthetic Wax
    • Mica
    • Isododecane
    • Ethylhexyl Palmitate
    • Microcrystalline Wax/Cera Microcristallina/Cire microcristalline
    • Polybutene
    • Silica
    • C13-15 Alkane
    • VP/Hexadecene Copolymer
    • Paraffin
    • Ethylene/Propylene Copolymer
    • Polyglyceryl-2 Triisostearate
    • Copernicia Cerifera Wax/Copernicia Cerifera Cera/Cire de carnauba
    • Caprylyl Glycol
    • Diisostearyl Malate
    • Gardenia Florida Fruit Extract
    • Glyceryl Caprylate
    • Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
    • Nelumbo Nucifera Flower Extract
    • Nymphaea Odorata Root Extract
    • Polyglyceryl-2 Diisostearate
    • Iron Oxides
    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • fragrance materialLinalool

      • Linalool: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
    • undeclared fragrance blendFragrance/Parfum

      • Fragrance/Parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.