Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/R.e.m. Beauty/Midnight Shadows Lustrous Liquid Eyeshadow, Fembot
Midnight Shadows Lustrous Liquid Eyeshadow, Fembot
R.e.m. Beauty

Midnight Shadows Lustrous Liquid Eyeshadow, Fembot

Eye Shadowtypically $12–30
B Smudged, Smokey Brown (2022 formulation)

Cleaner pick · Safest eye shadow we have rated

Sally B's Skin Yummies

B Smudged, Smokey Brown (2022 formulation)

+57 on ingredient safety

$30–70

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 4750 cleaner options →2 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

R.e.m. Beauty

Midnight Shadows Lustrous Liquid Eyeshadow, Fembot

Eye Shadow

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

43OUT OF 100Poor

Ingredient safety only

range 25–88

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

33-point split

68

Scan

55

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

4750 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 63-point gap between the two loudest voices.

25ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 4750 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

63 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·25 of 26 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 25 of 26 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (4)

    • titanium dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • bht7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • alcohol denat6/10fragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (21)

    • isododecane
    • calcium titanium borosilicate
    • calcium sodium borosilicate
    • trimethylsiloxysilicate
    • silica
    • synthetic fluorphlogopite
    • glyceryl tribehenate/isostearate/eicosandioate
    • octyldodecanol
    • hydrogenated styrene/isoprene copolymer
    • disteardimonium hectorite
    • caprylic/capric triglyceride
    • polyhydroxystearic acid
    • tin oxide
    • polyisoprene
    • isostearic acid
    • pentaerythrityl tetra-di-t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate
    • lecithin
    • polyglyceryl-3 polyricinoleate
    • water/aqua/eau
    • mica
    • iron oxides

    No data in our sources (1)

    • copper powder

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.