Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/COOLA/Sheer Mineral Liplux Sunscreen Lip Balm, Skinny Dip, Natural Brown Sugar, SPF 30
Sheer Mineral Liplux Sunscreen Lip Balm, Skinny Dip, Natural Brown Sugar, SPF 30
COOLA

Sheer Mineral Liplux Sunscreen Lip Balm, Skinny Dip, Natural Brown Sugar, SPF 30

Sun Caretypically $30–70
Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

Cleaner pick · Safest sunscreen we have rated

Iunik Global

Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

+44 on ingredient safety

$24

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1793 cleaner options →12 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

71OUT OF 100Good

range 64–91

56▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1793 found

See better →

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1793 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

52 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates COOLA as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·27 of 28 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 27 of 28 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (2)

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • FLAVOR6/10flavouring agent · fragrance ingredientraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (25)

    • ZINC OXIDEsoothing
    • BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII
    • C18-38 ALKYL HYDROXYSTEAROYL STEARATE
    • CAESALPINIA SAPPAN BARK EXTRACT
    • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL
    • COPERNICIA CERIFERA WAX
    • HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEED OIL
    • HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEED WAX
    • IRON OXIDES
    • HYDROGENATED CASTOR OIL
    • JOJOBA ESTERS
    • MICA
    • OCTYLDODECYL OLEATE
    • OCTYLDODECYL PCA
    • OLEA EUROPAEA FRUIT OIL
    • PERSEA GRATISSIMA OIL
    • POLYGLYCERIN-3
    • POLYHYDROXYSTEARIC ACID
    • ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS LEAF EXTRACT
    • SCHINZIOPHYTON RAUTANENII KERNEL OIL
    • SILICA
    • STEVIA REBAUDIANA EXTRACT
    • THEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTERrich occlusive
    • THEOBROMA GRANDIFLORUM SEED BUTTER
    • TIN OXIDE

    No data in our sources (1)

    • FLOWER WAX

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • rich occlusiveTHEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTER

      • THEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTER: A rich butter the FDA recognises by name as a skin protectant. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(d): "Cocoa butter, 50 to 100 percent."
    • soothingZINC OXIDE

      • ZINC OXIDE: A mineral UV filter that the FDA also recognises as a skin protectant. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(u), lists zinc oxide as a skin-protectant active at 1 to 25%. Its labelled indication is 21 CFR 347.50(b)(3), "dries the oozing and weeping of poison: ivy, oak, sumac". The monograph does not give it the "minor skin irritation and itching" wording.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.