Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Crest/Pro-Health Extra Whitening Power Fluoride Toothpaste (2019 formulation)
Pro-Health Extra Whitening Power Fluoride Toothpaste (2019 formulation)
Crest

Pro-Health Extra Whitening Power Fluoride Toothpaste (2019 formulation)

Oral Care
Natural Tooth Powder, Cinnamon

Cleaner pick · Safest oral care we have rated

BEE-OCH Organics

Natural Tooth Powder, Cinnamon

+49 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1278 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

55OUT OF 100Fair

range 33–87

51▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
59▲▼ split
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

40-point split

36

Scan

42

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1278 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Labor

A 58-point gap between the two loudest voices.

30Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofit
vs
88Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofit
050100

All 1278 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

49 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 61% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    58 pts apart
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    9 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • At least one rating was auto-linked to this product on a low-confidence match, so it may describe a different size or variant.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·18 of 18 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 18 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (6)

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • FLAVOR6/10flavouring agent · fragrance ingredientraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Stannous Fluoride 0.4544/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • ZINC LACTATE4/10deodorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE4/10cleansing · denaturant · foamingraters disagree

      Transparency concern · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • BLUE 14/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (12)

    • GLYCERIN
    • HYDRATED SILICA
    • SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOL
    • PEG-6
    • WATER
    • TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE
    • SODIUM GLUCONATE
    • CARRAGEENAN
    • SODIUM SACCHARIN
    • XANTHAN GUM
    • MICA

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.