Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/SeneGence/LashExtend
LashExtend
SeneGence

LashExtend

uncategorizedtypically $30–70
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+74 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 12748 cleaner options →6 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

56OUT OF 100Fair

range 51–83

26▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

15

Scan

25

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12748 found

See better →

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.

15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
80EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 12748 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

65 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·16 of 16 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 16 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (2)

  • Quaternium-1510/10common irritantpreservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

  • Acrylates Copolymer4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (14)

  • Water/Aqua/Eau
  • Glycerinhumectant
  • Myristoyl Pentapeptide-17
  • Polyester-5
  • Butylene Glycol
  • Camellia Sinensis Extract
  • Chamomilla Recutita Extract
  • Hydroxyethylcellulose
  • Sodium Chloride
  • Sodium Phosphate
  • Disodium Phosphate
  • Disodium EDTA
  • Iron Oxides
  • Ultramarines
What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • common irritantQuaternium-15

    • Quaternium-15: A preservative the EU no longer permits in cosmetics; the ban followed a reproductive-toxicity classification and a finding that its safety could not be established. Prohibited in cosmetics by EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex II entry 1386 (cis-1-(3-chlorallyl)-3,5,7-triaza-1-azoniaadamantane chloride, quaternium-15, CAS 51229-78-8), inserted by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/831, which simultaneously deleted its Annex V entry 31 permitting it as a preservative. Recital 6 of that Regulation gives TWO grounds, not one: the cis-isomer "has been classified as a CMR substance of category 2", AND the SCCS opinion of 13 to 14 December 2011 concluded that "on the basis of the available data the safety of Quaternium-15 for use in cosmetic products cannot be established". The underlying classification is Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (CLP) Annex VI index 612-251-00-9, inserted by Commission Regulation (EC) 790/2009: Flam. Sol. 2, Repr. 2 (H361d, "suspected of damaging the unborn child"), Acute Tox. 4, Skin Irrit. 2 (H315), Skin Sens. 1 (H317) and Aquatic Chronic 2. That entry carries no carcinogenicity classification of any kind. Skin Sens. 1 and Skin Irrit. 2 in the same entry are the harmonised classification behind this row's tag, so the tag rests on a sensitisation finding rather than on the reproductive-toxicity ground for the ban.
  • humectantGlycerin

    • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".