hover a pillar to set the scene →
Cleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer, listed safest first. Never ordered by affiliate payout.
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · IARC Monographs · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 67% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 67% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust9 of 9 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 9 listed ingredients.
Worth a look (1)
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (8)