Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L'Oréal/Infallible Up to 24hr Fresh Wear Soft Matte Bronzer, 250 Light
L'Oréal

Infallible Up to 24hr Fresh Wear Soft Matte Bronzer, 250 Light

Bronzer Highlighter

L'Oréal

Infallible Up to 24hr Fresh Wear Soft Matte Bronzer, 250 Light

Bronzer Highlighter

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

30OUT OF 100Horrible

range 18–58

—
Eco
—
Pkg

Why this score

40-point split

46

Scan

42

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2831 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.

5ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 2831 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

80 pts apart

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·30 of 31 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 30 of 31 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (10)

    • May Contain: CI 77891/Titanium Dioxide8/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Benzyl Salicylate7/10uv absorber · perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Parfum/Fragrance6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Hexyl Cinnamal6/10perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Linalool6/10perfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Benzyl Alcohol6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Citronellol6/10perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone4/10perfuming · skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CI 19140/Yellow 5 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (20)

    • Zinc Stearate
    • Dimethicone
    • Zea Mays Starch/Corn Starch
    • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
    • Silica
    • Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer
    • Triethoxycaprylylsilane
    • Caprylyl Glycol
    • Ethylhexylglycerin
    • Potassium Sorbate
    • Isoceteth-10
    • Alaria Esculenta Extract
    • Barium Sulfate
    • Tocopherol
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499/Iron Oxides
    • Mica
    • CI 77742/Manganese Violet
    • CI 77007/Ultramarines

    No data in our sources (1)

    • CI 15850/Red 7 Lake

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.