Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/P. Louise/Just The Two Of Us Double Ended Lipstick, Peach Tease And Squeeze Me
Just The Two Of Us Double Ended Lipstick, Peach Tease And Squeeze Me
P. Louise

Just The Two Of Us Double Ended Lipstick, Peach Tease And Squeeze Me

uncategorizedtypically $12–30

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+79 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 11609 cleaner options →9 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

62OUT OF 100Fair

range 54–83

21▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

0

Scan

42

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

11609 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 11609 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

raters agree
  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates P. Louise as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·36 of 37 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 36 of 37 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (8)

  • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • CI 453808/10colorantraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • AROMA6/10flavouringraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CI 158504/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (28)

  • POLYBUTENE
  • DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
  • HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
  • TOCOPHEROL
  • OCTYLDODECANOL
  • HYDROGENATED STYRENE/ISOPRENE COPOLYMER
  • PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
  • SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
  • C12-15 ALKYL BENZOATE
  • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
  • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
  • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77491
  • CI 77499
  • KAOLIN
  • NEOPENTYL GLYCOL DICAPRYLATE/DICAPRATE
  • COCO-CAPRYLATE/CAPRATE
  • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
  • SYNTHETIC WAX
  • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
  • SYNTHETIC BEESWAX
  • EUPHORBIA CERIFERA WAX
  • MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX
  • SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED OIL
  • HDI/TRIMETHYLOL HEXYLLACTONE CROSSPOLYMER
  • SILICA
  • CI 15985

No data in our sources (1)

  • CI 77499 VALENTINE TWO WAY LIPSTICK INCI DIMETHICONE

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfreeinternational.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.