Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/e.l.f./Cosmetics e.l.f. Lip Lacquer, Moody
Cosmetics e.l.f. Lip Lacquer, Moody
e.l.f.

Cosmetics e.l.f. Lip Lacquer, Moody

Lip Gloss

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+56 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 8242 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

67OUT OF 100Fair

range 57–91

44▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
90
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

51-point split

42

Scan

25

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

8242 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.

25Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 8242 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

65 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates e.l.f. as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    10 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·26 of 27 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 26 of 27 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (8)

    • Retinyl Acetate9/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Fragrance6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Benzyl Alcohol6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Hexyl Cinnamal6/10perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Arachis Hypogaea Oil4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Red 7 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (18)

    • Polyisobutene
    • Paraffinum Liquidum
    • Ethylhexyl Palmitate
    • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
    • Tridecyl Trimellitate
    • Hydrogenated Styrene/Isoprene Copolymer
    • Persea Gratissima Oil
    • Vitis Vinifera Seed Oil
    • Diisostearyl Malate
    • Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
    • Limnanthes Alba Seed Oil
    • Caprylyl Glycol
    • Hydrogenated Palm Kernel Oil
    • Silica Dimethyl Silylate
    • Tocopheryl Acetate
    • Tocopherol
    • Black Iron Oxide
    • Yellow Iron Oxide

    No data in our sources (1)

    • May Contain: Limonene Red Iron Oxide

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.