Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Black Opal/Beauty Invisible HD Finishing Powder (2020 formulation)
Beauty Invisible HD Finishing Powder (2020 formulation)
Black Opal

Beauty Invisible HD Finishing Powder (2020 formulation)

uncategorized
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+52 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 15234 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

48OUT OF 100Poor

Ingredient safety only

range 30–95

48▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

65-point split

30

Scan

95

Precautionary

58

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

15234 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.

30Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 15234 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

65 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·27 of 28 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 27 of 28 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (7)

    • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Red 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Red 7 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Red 28 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Red 40 Lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Yellow 5 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Blue 1 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (20)

    • Silica
    • Aluminum Starch Octenylsuccinate
    • Polymethylsilsesquioxane
    • Aqua/Water/Eau
    • Dimethiconerich occlusive
    • Mica
    • Sodium Potassium Aluminum Silicate
    • Synthetic Fluorphlogopite
    • Tin Oxide
    • Hexylene Glycol
    • Caprylyl Glycol
    • Iron Oxides
    • Manganese Violet
    • Bismuth Oxychloride
    • Chromium Hydroxide Green
    • Chromium Oxide Greens
    • Ultramarines
    • Ferric Ferrocyanide
    • Aluminum Powder
    • Yellow 6 Lake

    No data in our sources (1)

    • Phenoxyethanol May Contain: Titanium Dioxide

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • rich occlusiveDimethicone

      • Dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.