Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Too Faced/Peach My Cheeks Melting Powder Blush, Pinch My Peach (2018 formulation)
Peach My Cheeks Melting Powder Blush, Pinch My Peach (2018 formulation)
Too Faced

Peach My Cheeks Melting Powder Blush, Pinch My Peach (2018 formulation)

Blush

Too Faced

Peach My Cheeks Melting Powder Blush, Pinch My Peach (2018 formulation)

Blush

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

58OUT OF 100Fair

range 55–69

—
Labor

Why this score

40-point split

43

Scan

42

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2557 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 2557 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

40 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·27 of 27 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 27 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (8)

  • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Flavor/Aroma6/10raters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Benzyl Benzoate6/10perfuming · antimicrobial · solventraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Fragrance/Parfum6/10perfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Polyethylene4/10film forming · abrasive · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Blue 1 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 28 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (19)

  • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
  • C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate
  • Isodecyl Isononanoate
  • Phenyl Trimethicone
  • Silica
  • Dicalcium Phosphate
  • Synthetic Fluorphlogopite
  • Mica
  • Silica Silylate
  • Aqua/Water/Eau
  • Carthamus Tinctorius Seed Oil/Carthamus Tinctorius Seed Oil
  • Ficus Carica Fruit Extract/Ficus Carica Fruit Extract
  • Pentaerythrityl Tetra-di-t-butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate
  • Potassium Sorbate
  • Propylene Glycol Dicaprylate/Dicaprate
  • Prunus Persica Fruit Extract/Prunus Persica Fruit Extract
  • Tocopheryl Acetate
  • Xanthan Gum
  • Iron Oxides

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.