L.A. Girl
Lip Mousse Velvet Lip Color, Lowkey
Lip Glosstypically under $12
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+46 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 53-point gap between the two loudest voices.
40Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 5613 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
53 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates L.A. Girl as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust20 of 21 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 20 of 21 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (7)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (13)
- DIMETHICONE
- HYDROGENATED POLYDECENE
- TRIPHENYL TRIMETHICONE
- METHYL HYDROGENATED ROSINATE
- DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
- DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
- HYDROGENATED COCONUT OIL
- DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
- LAURYL PEG-9 POLYDIMETHYLSILOXYETHYL DIMETHICONE
- POLYGLYCERYL-3 DIISOSTEARATE
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- SILICA
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.