Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 27-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust17 of 17 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 17 listed ingredients.
Worth a look (3)
EU-prohibitedflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (14)
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from coohom.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.