Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Il-Makiage/Lip Service Hi-Shine Lip Glaze Bow Down
Lip Service Hi-Shine Lip Glaze Bow Down
Il-Makiage

Lip Service Hi-Shine Lip Glaze Bow Down

Lip Gloss

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+43 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 4130 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

73OUT OF 100Good

range 65–91

57▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
88
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

4130 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 4130 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

52 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·16 of 16 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 16 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (4)

    • CINNAMAL7/10fragrance materialperfuming · denaturant · flavouringraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • AROMA6/10undeclared fragrance blendflavouringraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • LINALOOL6/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • BENZYL CINNAMATE4/10fragrance materialperfumingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (12)

    • POLYBUTENE
    • HYDROGENATED POLYDECENE
    • OCTYLDODECANOL
    • ISOCETYL STEARATE
    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE
    • HYDROGENATED STYRENE/ISOPRENE COPOLYMER
    • SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
    • CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE
    • PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • CI 77491
    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • fragrance materialLINALOOL, CINNAMAL, BENZYL CINNAMATE

      • LINALOOL: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
      • CINNAMAL: A cinnamon-scented fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 76: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
      • BENZYL CINNAMATE: A balsamic fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 81: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
    • undeclared fragrance blendAROMA

      • AROMA: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.