Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Joy Lorraine/Powder Blush, Manakin (2020 formulation)
Powder Blush, Manakin (2020 formulation)
Joy Lorraine

Powder Blush, Manakin (2020 formulation)

Blush
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+82 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 16264 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

18OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 0–85

18▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

lenses agree

0

Scan

0

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

16264 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 16264 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

85 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·21 of 24 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 21 of 24 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (13)

    • Cyclomethicone10/10emollient · hair conditioning · solventraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Imidazolidinyl urea8/10preservativeraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • D&C Red #21 Aluminium Lake8/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • D&C Red #34 Calcium Lake8/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • D&C Red #30 Lake8/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Methylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • Propylparaben7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

    • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • D&C Red #7 Calcium Lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • D&C Red #6 Barium Lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • D&C Red #27 Aluminium Lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • D&C Red #33 Aluminium Lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (8)

    • May Contain: Iron Oxides
    • Manganese Violet
    • Mica
    • Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate
    • Iron Oxides
    • Carmine
    • Ultramarine Pink
    • Ultramarine Blue

    No data in our sources (3)

    • SteaZinc rate
    • Octyl Palmitate
    • Tin Oxides

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.