Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Iman Cosmetics/Luxury Radiance Liquid Makeup, Sand 5 (2020 formulation)
Luxury Radiance Liquid Makeup, Sand 5 (2020 formulation)
Iman Cosmetics

Luxury Radiance Liquid Makeup, Sand 5 (2020 formulation)

uncategorized
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+79 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 18803 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

21OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 0–90

21▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

25-point split

0

Scan

0

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

18803 found

See better →

Flagged

11 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 90-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 18803 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

90 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·33 of 35 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 33 of 35 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (11)

    • Isobutylparaben10/10antimicrobialraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Methylisothiazolinone7/10common irritantpreservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Methylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Ethylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Butylparaben7/10fragrance materialpreservative · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

    • Propylparaben7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

    • Cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Saccharomyces Zinc Ferment4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (22)

    • Water
    • Glycerinhumectant
    • Sorbitol
    • C12 15 Alkyl Benzoate
    • Dimethicone/Vinyltrimethylsiloxysilicate Crosspolymer
    • Dimethiconerich occlusive
    • Cera Alba
    • Jojoba Esters
    • Sorbitan Isostearate
    • PEG 30 Dipolyhydroxystearate
    • Magnesium Sulfate
    • Microcrystalline Wax
    • Magnesium Stearate
    • Cetyl PEG/PPG 10/1 Dimethicone
    • Tocopheryl Acetate
    • Saccharomyces Copper Ferment
    • Saccharomyces Iron Ferment
    • Saccharomyces Silicon Ferment
    • Saccharomyces Potassium Ferment
    • Triethoxycaprylylsilane
    • Iron Oxides
    • Mica

    No data in our sources (2)

    • Saccharomyces Magnesium Ferment
    • May Contain

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (3)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantMethylisothiazolinone

      • Methylisothiazolinone: A preservative that patch-test clinics see reactions to often enough that the EU banned it from leave-on products. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2013 (Castanedo-Tardana MP, Zug KA, Dermatitis 2013;24(1):2-6); SCCS Opinion on Methylisothiazolinone (P94), Submission II, SENSITISATION ONLY (SCCS/1521/13, revision of 27 March 2014); banned in leave-on cosmetics by Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1198, which recites the need to address "the increased incidence of allergies induced by methylisothiazolinone".
    • rich occlusiveDimethicone

      • Dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
    • humectantGlycerin

      • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".