Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Huda Beauty US/The Overachiever High Coverage Concealer, Coconut Flakes 10N
The Overachiever High Coverage Concealer, Coconut Flakes 10N
Huda Beauty US

The Overachiever High Coverage Concealer, Coconut Flakes 10N

Concealertypically $12–30
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+57 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 16108 cleaner options →6 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

43OUT OF 100Poor

Ingredient safety only

range 25–88

43▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

16108 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 63-point gap between the two loudest voices.

25ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 16108 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

63 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·37 of 37 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 37 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (6)

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • BENZYL SALICYLATE7/10uv absorber · perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • CAFFEINE6/10perfuming · skin conditioningraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • PARFUM6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • LINALOOL6/10perfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (31)

    • WATER / AQUA / EAU
    • ETHYL TRISILOXANE
    • DIMETHICONE
    • HDI/TRIMETHYLOL HEXYLLACTONE CROSSPOLYMER
    • POLYGLYCERYL-2 ISOSTEARATE/DIMER DILINOLEATE COPOLYMER
    • PEG-10 DIMETHICONE
    • CAPRYLYL METHICONE
    • PROPANEDIOL
    • GLYCERIN
    • DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
    • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
    • ALBIZIA JULIBRISSIN BARK EXTRACT
    • SODIUM CHLORIDE
    • HYDROGEN DIMETHICONE
    • GLYCERYL CAPRYLATE
    • SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • ISODODECANE
    • BUTYLENE GLYCOL
    • C30-45 ALKYL CETEARYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
    • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
    • TETRASODIUM EDTA
    • ANASTATICA HIEROCHUNTICA EXTRACT
    • SILICA
    • CAMELLIA SINENSIS LEAF EXTRACT
    • LACTOBACILLUS FERMENT
    • DARUTOSIDE
    • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
    • CI 77499
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492