Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Paul Mitchell/Shampoo Three, Clarifying (2019 formulation)
Shampoo Three, Clarifying (2019 formulation)
Paul Mitchell

Shampoo Three, Clarifying (2019 formulation)

Shampoo
Bio Therapy Conditioner

Cleaner pick · Safest cleansing we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Conditioner

+79 on ingredient safety

250ml · 47.50 ZAR · 19 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 10776 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

54OUT OF 100Poor

range 43–84

21▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

32-point split

0

Scan

32

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

10776 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
80ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 10776 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

80 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Paul Mitchell as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    10 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·28 of 29 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 28 of 29 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (6)

    • SODIUM BORATE10/10bufferingraters disagree

      Reproductive-toxicant concern · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • TRISODIUM NTA10/10chelatingraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

    • METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE7/10preservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • LIMONENE7/10perfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE6/10preservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • SODIUM HYDROXIDE4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (22)

    • SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE
    • DISODIUM COCOAMPHODIACETATE
    • UREA
    • MAGNESIUM SULFATE
    • SODIUM THIOSULFATE
    • GLYCINE
    • LEUCINE
    • TYROSINE
    • CYSTEINE
    • PLANTAGO MAJOR LEAF EXTRACT
    • TRITICUM VULGARE PROTEIN
    • SULFATED CASTOR OIL
    • DISODIUM EDTA-COPPER
    • TETRASODIUM EDTA
    • MAGNESIUM CARBONATE
    • TRISODIUM EDTA
    • MAGNESIUM NITRATE
    • BISAMINO PEG/PPG-41/3 AMINOETHYL PG-PROPYL DIMETHICONE
    • PEG-12 DIMETHICONE
    • DISODIUM EDTA
    • SODIUM GLYCOLATE
    • MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE

    No data in our sources (1)

    • SYMPHYTUM OFFICINALE EXTRACT

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.