Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Bath & Body Works/Creamy Luxe Hand Soap (2019 formulation)
Creamy Luxe Hand Soap (2019 formulation)
Bath & Body Works

Creamy Luxe Hand Soap (2019 formulation)

uncategorized
Birch Moisturizing Hand Cream

Cleaner pick · Safest hands & feet we have rated

Round Lab

Birch Moisturizing Hand Cream

+90 on ingredient safety

$8.50

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2405 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

61OUT OF 100Fair

range 58–79

10▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
88
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

lenses agree

0

Scan

0

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2405 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 64-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
64IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2405 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

64 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 50% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·39 of 40 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 39 of 40 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (20)

  • BUTYLPHENYL METHYLPROPIONAL10/10fragrance materialperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    Reproductive-toxicant concern · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • VIOLET 28/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • GREEN 38/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE7/10common irritantpreservativeraters disagree

    Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • LIMONENE7/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • FRAGRANCE6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • BENZYL ALCOHOL6/10fragrance materialpreservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE6/10common irritantpreservativeraters disagree

    Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • LINALOOL6/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • GERANIOL6/10fragrance materialperfuming · tonicraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • CITRONELLOL6/10fragrance materialperfumingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • ACRYLATES COPOLYMER4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE4/10common irritantcleansing · denaturant · foamingraters disagree

    Transparency concern · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • SODIUM HYDROXIDE4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • ALOE BARBADENSIS LEAF JUICE4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

    IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • HYDROXYCITRONELLAL4/10fragrance materialperfumingraters disagree

    EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • YELLOW 54/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (19)

  • WATER
  • SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE
  • LAURAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE
  • SODIUM CHLORIDE
  • PROPANEDIOL
  • OLETH-10
  • SODIUM LAUROYL SARCOSINATE
  • POLYSORBATE 20
  • DIPROPYLENE GLYCOL
  • PROPYLENE GLYCOLcommon irritant
  • PEG/PPG-8/3 DIISOSTEARATE
  • SILICA
  • TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL
  • TETRASODIUM EDTA
  • METHYL GLUCETH-20
  • POLYGLYCERYL-3 LAURATE
  • TIN OXIDE
  • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
  • HYDROLYZED SILK

No data in our sources (1)

  • EXT

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (3)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • common irritantSODIUM LAURYL SULFATE, PROPYLENE GLYCOL, METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE, METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE

    • SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE: A strong cleansing agent used as the reference irritant in skin-irritation testing. OECD Test Guideline 439 (in vitro skin irritation, reconstructed human epidermis), paragraph 24: "The suggested PC is 5% aqueous SDS", sodium dodecyl sulphate, the same substance as sodium lauryl sulfate, CAS 151-21-3.
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOL: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
    • METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE: A preservative restricted to rinse-off products in the EU because of contact-allergy reports. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex V entry 39 (rinse-off only, 0,0015% of a 3:1 mixture with methylisothiazolinone). The reason is in Commission Regulation (EU) No 1003/2014, recital 3, quoted rather than summarised: "The SCCS concluded that the mixture of Methylchloroisothiazolinone (and) Methylisothiazolinone in a ratio of 3:1 does not pose a risk to the health of the consumer when used as a preservative up to a maximum authorised concentration of 0,0015 % in rinse-off cosmetic products, apart from its skin sensitising potential. The SCCS indicated that induction and elicitation would be less likely in a rinse-off product than when the same concentration is present in a leave-on product." SCCS/1238/09 concludes it "is well recognised as an important skin sensitiser at current conditions of use".
    • METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE: A preservative that patch-test clinics see reactions to often enough that the EU banned it from leave-on products. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2013 (Castanedo-Tardana MP, Zug KA, Dermatitis 2013;24(1):2-6); SCCS Opinion on Methylisothiazolinone (P94), Submission II, SENSITISATION ONLY (SCCS/1521/13, revision of 27 March 2014); banned in leave-on cosmetics by Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1198, which recites the need to address "the increased incidence of allergies induced by methylisothiazolinone".
  • fragrance materialBENZYL ALCOHOL, LIMONENE, LINALOOL, BUTYLPHENYL METHYLPROPIONAL, GERANIOL, HYDROXYCITRONELLAL, CITRONELLOL

    • BENZYL ALCOHOL: Used both as a fragrance component and as a preservative; the EU names it either way. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 45: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (38), which is footnote (37) plus a condition: stock that does not comply may still be made available until 31 July 2028 only "provided that they comply with the restrictions applicable on 15 August 2023", and only if it was lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off. Entry 45 covers its non-preservative use; it is separately an allowed preservative at Annex V entry 34.
    • LIMONENE: A citrus-smelling fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related isomers. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 88: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (37): stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, may still be made available until 31 July 2028. It is marked on the racemic dl-limonene/Dipentene line and the (S)-(l-limonene) line, but NOT the (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene (d-limonene) line, CAS 5989-27-5, whose duty was already running as entry 88 before Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 and so needed no transition. All three isomers are declared under the single glossary name "Limonene", so that name on a label does not identify which of them is present.
    • LINALOOL: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
    • BUTYLPHENYL METHYLPROPIONAL: A lily-of-the-valley fragrance component the EU no longer permits in cosmetics. It was a declarable fragrance allergen at Annex III entry 83 of EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009. Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1902 deleted that entry and moved it to Annex II entry 1666 (2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl) propionaldehyde, CAS 80-54-6), prohibiting it in cosmetic products from 1 March 2022.
    • GERANIOL: A rose-scented fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 78: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
    • HYDROXYCITRONELLAL: A lily-like fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 72: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
    • CITRONELLOL: A rose-and-citrus fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 86: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
  • undeclared fragrance blendFRAGRANCE

    • FRAGRANCE: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.